Chemical Research in Chinese Universities ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 887-892.doi: 10.1007/s40242-018-8306-8

• Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Determination of Lignans in Schisandra sphenanthera and Schisandra chinensis Using Ionic Liquid-based Ultrasonic-assisted Extraction and High-performance Liquid Chromatography

GUAN Lianyue1, LUO Qiang1, LIANG Na2, YU Wei1   

  1. 1. China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130033, P. R. China;
    2. Office of Surgical Nursing, Changchun Medical College, Changchun 130031, P. R. China
  • Received:2018-09-21 Online:2018-12-01 Published:2018-11-12
  • Contact: YU Wei E-mail:yuwei3721105@sina.com
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.81671220, 81502516) and the Jilin Provincial School Joint Construction Special Project, China(No.SXGJQY2017-13).

Abstract: A green, rapid and precise sample pretreatment technique, IL-based UAE(ionic liquid-based ultrasonic-assisted extraction), was coupled with high-performance liquid chromatographic separation to identify the main effective components in Schisandra sphenanthera(S. sphenanthera) and Schisandra chinensis(S. chinensis) including schisantherin A, schisandrin A, and deoxyschizandrin. Four different types of ionic liquids have been investigated, finally[C6MIM] [BF4] was used as the extraction solvent. A powder form of S. sphenanthera and S. chinensis was mixed with the[C6MIM] [BF4] to produce a suspension. This suspension was ultrasonically extracted in a water bath at room temperature. Several of the process parameters were optimized, including the type of ionic liquid used and its volume, the sample amount, the size of the sample particle, the extraction time, etc. HPLC calibration curves were established for all the analytes and proved to be linear(r>0.9999). The lowest detection level for schisandrin A was 0.12 μg/mL, for schisantherin A was 0.08 μg/mL, and for deoxyschizandrin was 0.10 μg/mL. The recoveries of the target compounds were from 74.19% to 109.33%. The standard deviations for detection were generally no more than 6.31%. In contrast to conventional extraction methods, the IL-based UAE did not involve volatile organic volatile solvents, and the analysis time, required sample and solvent volumes were also lower than those of the conventional techniques.

Key words: Ionic liquid, High-performance liquid chromatography, Ultrasonic-assisted extraction, Effective constituent